Day 1,715.

By ne-yizh-z-lopaty.bsky.social (@ne-yizh-z-lopaty.bsky.social)
Published:

Day 1,715. Trump’s party gets crushed in the midterms, Russia’s offensive produces almost no net gain, and the Kremlin still wants negotiations on terms that reward it for refusing to stop. A busy day for people who keep insisting the plan is working.

Trump’s leverage

The election result matters because Trump’s leverage is not magic. A president can threaten, flatter, pressure allies and announce a deal before anyone has agreed to one. But when his party loses both chambers of Congress, that performance gets harder to sell as inevitability. It does not mean US policy suddenly becomes reliable, or that Ukraine should build its future around American election cycles. It means the man who keeps treating other people’s countries like bargaining chips has less room to pretend the whole machine is his personal cash register.

Moscow will keep looking for an opening. Its favorite negotiating position is familiar: reject a ceasefire, keep attacking, then demand sanctions relief as the price of discussing a pause in attacks on energy infrastructure. That is not diplomacy. It is a man setting a fire, blocking the door, and asking for payment before he considers putting down the match.

The battlefield and the map

The battlefield is less impressed by the press releases. A Russian Z-project’s own figures put October’s net territorial gain at roughly seven square kilometers, the smallest since autumn 2023 by its accounting. Seven. After months of assault, the grand imperial machine has managed to occupy a patch of land smaller than the confidence of one evening’s state television.

That does not make the front safe or the war easy. It does make the official victory stories look increasingly like office paperwork for imaginary territory. Russian propagandists have spent years announcing places captured before their troops control them. Then the map catches up with reality, and the same commentators act surprised that their virtual real estate portfolio did not come with actual keys.

NATO, meanwhile, is reportedly reconsidering what deterring Russia requires. The old assumption that Europe could mostly defend itself near its borders is giving way to a harsher calculation: if Russia can launch attacks from far away, the ability to hit military targets deep inside Russia may be part of stopping those attacks. The Kremlin spent years insisting that distance and threats would keep its war machine untouchable. Turns out threats do not count as air defense.

Occupation and evidence

Ukraine’s strike on the occupation-linked Phoenix telecom network in Donetsk fits the same logic. The operator uses equipment seized from Kyivstar after the city was occupied. Three reported hits are not just a dent in infrastructure. They expose the neat little fiction that occupation turns stolen property into legitimate administration. Put a new name on the tower, keep the stolen equipment, call it governance. The label does not change the receipt.

Then there is Borshchahivka, where the useful question is the one propaganda always hopes people skip: what actually happened, and what evidence supports the story being pushed? A dramatic caption is not a source. A clipped video is not a full account. The Russian information machine understands that a rumor can travel faster than a correction, so it throws the claim out first and lets everyone else do the unpaid cleanup. The answer is not to invent a counter-story. It is to check the facts before the clowns finish building their set.

Donations and the day’s pattern

The same applies to the argument about donations and Maxim Katz. If people outside Ukraine are sending money to support Ukraine’s armed forces, the practical question is whether the funds reach the stated purpose, not whether a pundit likes the donors’ passports. Payment options such as PayPal and crypto can make transfers possible for Russians abroad who cannot or do not want to use Ukrainian banking apps. That does not turn every Russian donor into a hero, and it certainly does not wash the Kremlin clean. It simply means a slogan about who gives is no substitute for looking at the actual transfers.

The day’s pattern is plain. Trump’s political power takes a hit. Russia’s offensive grinds forward at a rate its own friendly monitors can barely dress up. Its occupation network runs on stolen Ukrainian equipment. And when talks come up, Moscow tries to invoice Ukraine for the privilege of hearing the word “pause.”

The empire still has the threats, the flags, the television graphics and the paperwork. What it increasingly lacks is the part where the story matches the ground.