Alright, let’s talk about Kyiv.

By Owen Sutton (@owensutton22.bsky.social)
Published:

kyiv is the capital, the flex, the place every regional boss wants to run, and somehow it still feels like the city is held together by duct tape and pure chaos. you got the most money, the most people, the most business, and the most "what the fuck is happening" per square meter. cross the dnipro at rush hour and you see what i mean. new high-rises spawn overnight, playgrounds vanish, and the only thing moving faster than the skyline is the collective confusion.

money to burn, brains on standby

kyiv’s 2026 budget? 106 billion hryvnias. that’s more than dnipro, kharkiv, lviv, and odesa put together. you could gold-plate the potholes or at least stop them from eating ladas whole. the city’s got the best hand at the table: top talent, biggest economy, all the chips. if kyiv was a poker player, the rest would be begging for a loan.

so why does it always feel like the city’s one bad day from a meltdown? because the place runs on vibes, not plans. the money’s there, but the brains are out to lunch. every decision is a coin toss between the mayor and the president’s crew, and the only thing they agree on is blaming each other when shit breaks.

institutions built on sand

kyiv’s got more cash than sense, but the real problem is the institutions. not the buildings, the rules. who decides what, who checks the work, who even knows what the hell is going on? in kyiv, the answer is "depends who you ask and what day it is." the president’s vertical grabs some power, the mayor grabs the rest, and the rope they’re fighting over is made of red tape.

the city’s self-government is a joke. no clear lines, no real public debate, just a bunch of suits making calls behind closed doors. most people find out about decisions when a construction fence goes up under their window or their bus route disappears. surprise, your commute just got longer and your view just got uglier.

kyiv’s got the resources to be a world-class city, but the governance of a banana republic.

left bank, right mess

split by the dnipro, the city’s got a built-in headache. the left bank holds over a million people (36% of the city as of 2015), but only 18% of the jobs. so every morning, half the left bank tries to cross the river to work, and every night they crawl back. the bridges are a daily hunger games, and the only thing more jammed than the roads is the city’s decision-making.

with all that cash, you’d think someone would fix it. but nope, your address still decides if you spend your life in traffic or just most of it. the city’s got the resources to balance things out, but the willpower is missing in action.

other cities, other rules

look at kharkiv. yeah, the city getting shelled for years, and they still fix shit faster than kyiv can schedule a meeting. in kharkiv, decisions get made and done, because when bombs are falling, you don’t have time for endless approvals. public transport? free. heating tariffs? not going up. not perfect, but at least it moves.

then there’s lviv. they went slow and steady, built a planning institute, made a long-term plan, and stuck to it. it’s not sexy, but it works. they plan, they talk, they build consensus. it’s like watching someone build ikea furniture with the manual, while kyiv’s just smashing pieces together and hoping for a chair.

the wild part? transparency in ukrainian cities has nothing to do with money, size, or region. it’s about how long and how well you’ve built your institutions. if your city’s run by one big boss, sure, stuff gets done fast, but there’s no debate, no pluralism, no way to handle real complexity. when the boss leaves or screws up, the whole thing falls apart like a jenga tower after a bad move.

rich city, broke system

kyiv’s stuck in limbo. it’s got the cash to be a showcase, but the rules are fuzzy, the institutions are weak, and the decision-making is about as clear as a brick wall. the result? a city that’s rich but dysfunctional, busy but disorganized, full of potential but always tripping over its own shoelaces.

the little stuff adds up. transport? a mess. new transit pops up with no rules, old stuff disappears with no warning. parking? good luck. land use? if you know the right guy, you can build whatever, wherever. garbage? still a problem, because nobody wants to piss off someone’s cousin in city council. every issue is a mini version of the big problem: too much money, not enough order.

the people? spectators in their own city. decisions get made in the clouds, and by the time the news trickles down, it’s too late. want to protest a new building? sorry, the fence is already up. want to have a say in transport? maybe next decade. the only thing more consistent than the lack of transparency is the feeling that the city’s being run for someone else’s benefit.

the tug-of-war nobody wins

the presidential-mayoral tug-of-war is the cherry on top. half the power sits with the president’s appointees, half with the elected mayor. everyone can blame someone else, and nothing gets done. it’s like a relay race where both runners refuse to let go of the baton, so they just stand there arguing while the city waits.

so what’s the fix? not more money, kyiv’s drowning in it. not more flashy projects or strongman bullshit. what the city needs is real self-government, clear rules, and institutions that actually work. transparency, public debate, a culture where decisions get made out in the open, not behind closed doors. stop treating residents like an afterthought and start letting them in on the process.

until that happens, kyiv will keep running in circles. the city will get richer, but not better. the bridges will stay jammed, the high-rises will keep popping up in all the wrong places, and people will keep wondering why nothing ever changes except the skyline. the capital will stay a showcase, but for all the wrong reasons.

kyiv’s got everything it needs to be great, except the basics. until the city figures out how to actually run itself, all that money and talent is just window dressing on a mess. and the rest of the country? they’re watching, taking notes, and probably laughing, because if the capital can’t get its act together, what hope does anyone else have?

russian propaganda: we will take kyiv by friday. reality: they couldnt even take out the trash by monday.